Writing academic papers is a common way to find inspiration from others in order to create your paper. Students should communicate their thoughts and consider the contributions of others in the field. It is acceptable to borrow ideas from other scholars. Plagiarizing constitutes a crime. Plagiarism, which can also be considered a violation to copyright, is a crime. But where is the line between these two? It is essential to include any reference in the work. Carlos Alberto Decotelli, the former Minister of Education, resigned in June following his master’s thesis accusation of plagiarism.
Plagiarism in academia is unfortunately a common problem. But, it can be difficult to define plagiarism in practice. We’ll explain how to avoid common forms of plagiarism. Note: Using the paraphrase tool to do the job would also help you in this field.
This is the easiest and most familiar to students. This is when you copy a paragraph, sentence or entire piece word for word without citing the source.
Plagiarism occurs when a text includes multiple ideas or concepts taken from other works, and is then merged into a single text. The idea of plagiarism isn’t affected by whether the student copied the main idea from another work or its conclusion. Plagiarism can simply be the combination or addition of multiple ideas or paragraphs, without citing the original authors. Plagiarism can occur regardless of whether the excerpts were added word for word, or modified terms.
Because academic work requires the student to create a new text with his thoughts and ideas based on other researchers’ concepts. It doesn’t simply combine ideas of different authors. Respect copyright by explaining concepts using the words of other authors or learning from them. It is possible to add to the original work by adding additional information that directly links to its themes.
As the name suggests it, it is plagiarism of another author’s idea. Sometimes, you may be able to develop a concept through research that helps explain a phenomena. It is possible to borrow concepts from other authors and make them into nomenclatures. You will be considered “conceptual Plagiarising” if the concept is derived from another source without citing the source.
How to avoid plagiarising academically
To avoid plagiarism, it is best to identify where the original ideas came from as soon as possible. In general, all citations must include the following information. The author’s name (commonly identified using their last name), year of publication and page number in which the original idea was discovered. The ABNT suggests two types of quotations.
Get a direct quote
If you plan to faithfully transcribe an excerpt, the direct quotation is necessary. These forms look very similar. However, they should be marked with quotation marks.
This is the only quote:
This format allows you insert the author’s quote, and then add three pieces about your work in brackets at the end. You must make sure that the author’s name is in capital letters
Citation in paragraph
You will need to include the quote in your text. Your text will include the quote as a paragraph. Example: Butler stated that “The deconstructions and deconstructions if identity are not deconstructions if politics” (p. 213).
Citations that contain more than three lines
If your quote takes up more then 3 lines of text, reduce your font to 10 and indent 4 cm. This will make the text standout and emphasize the fact that it is a quotation by another author. This does not mean that quotation marks must be used.
Paraphrasing is a way to use words other than those of the author. A indirect quote is also possible. This allows you to interpret the words of the author in your own words. In this instance, the book page does not need to be mentioned. The guidelines for direct quotation should be followed when mentioning the author or surname of a reference. These are two examples.
Example 1: According Butler (1990). p 213. The deconstruction and reinterpretation identity is what creates a “gender”, which can be used to describe a politician.
Example 2: A deconstruction of identity leads us to create a “gender”, like a politician (BUTLER 90).